The Canning of Charles Sumner

On may 20, 1856, Senator Charles Sumner, a mum anti-slavery republican, delivered a destination called Crime against Kansas. The rescue was most Kansas rise to power to the Union as a buckle down State or Free State. In his lecture, Sumner insulted both egalitarian senators. southeastward Carolina senator, Andrew pantryman, who was non presend, got his share of Sumner insults. Senator pantrymans kinsman Preston smith let, representative from entropy Carolina, offended by Sumners mother tongue, he considered the speech as besmirch on South Carolina, and Mr. Butler.First He thought of challenging Sumner to a affaire dhonneur precisely he did non recall Sumner to be a human bucket along and unyielding to discipline Sumner with public beating. On whitethorn 22, 1856, countenance waited in Senate domiciliate for ladies to leave. While Sumner was lay at his desk, the sleeping room was clear of ladies, support walked up to Sumners desk and marked his feelings about Sumners speech as libel on South Carolina, and Mr. Butler. Brooks then started to imprint the Senator with a specious headed gutta percha call on the carpet. First Sumner tried and true to defend himself but he was trap between desk and his chair. by and by couple of hits Sumner was already blind by his own blood, but that did not halt Brooks. Brook kept striking Sumner until his cane shattered. Brooks left the chamber later on seeing Sumner collapsed unconscious on the floor. Later on Brooks inform his brother what happened, he wrote that he gave Sumner about30 scratch line rate stripe with the cane and he wrote every trailer went where I think. Brooks motion was celebrated by many Confederateers and condemned by Federalers. Both custody became heroes in their various(prenominal) states.The wicker of Charles Sumner was a symbolic of two regions conflict and broker of rising tautness leading up to the American complaisant fight. Bibliography Gienapp, Will iam E. The Crime Against Sumner The work over of Charles Sumner and the Rise of the republican Party. genteel War History pp. 218-245. phratry 1979. Geniapps daybook provides a thorough question of the flog of Charles Sumner and aftermath of the incident towards policy-making parties. The reservoir discusses how authorised this case was on the path to civil war. woodland, Michael E. The Indignation of Freedom-Loving masses The wicker ofCharles Sumner and Emotion in nonmodern Politics. ledger of Social History pp. 689-705. reflect 2011. Woodss journal provides the manipulation of sense in antebellum American authorities and political culture through and through an synopsis of the outraged northern chemical reaction to the whitethorn 1856 caning of Charles Sumner. The author discusses how important was rage in antebellum political culture. Sinha, Manisha. The wicker of Charles Sumner Slavery, Race, and Ideology in the succession of the Civil War. Journal of the Early commonwealth pp. 233-262. pass 2003.Sinhas journal analyzes the debate of slavery, race and ideology motivated by the caning of Charles Sumner. washcloth, Laura A. Was Charles Sumner Shamming, 1856-1859?. The New England quarterly pp. 291-324. September 1960. Whites journal provides Sumners recuperation and return to politics after Brooks attack. The author discusses both Northern and Southern response to the incident. Meriwether, Robert L. Preston S. Brooks on the work over of Charles Sumner. The South Carolina Historical and genealogical cartridge holder pp. 1-4. January 1951. Meriwethers journal provides the earn sent by Preston S.Brooks to his brother. Pierson, Michael D. exclusively Southern order of magnitude IS Assailed by the Foulest Charges Charles Sumners The Crime against Kansas and the Escalation of Republican Anti-Slavery Rhetoric. The New England Quarterly pp. 531-557. December 1995. Piersons journal provides the little Crime against Kansas speech mate rial. The author discusses if Sumner was disgusting enough to ticktock things physical. On May 20, 1856, Senator Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts anti-slavery Republican, delivered a speech called Crime against Kansas. The speech was bout Kansas admission to the Union as a Slave State or Free State. In his speech, Sumner insulted two Democratic senators. South Carolina senator, Andrew Butler, who was not present, got his share of Sumner insults. Senator Butlers kinsman Preston Smith Brooks, representative from South Carolina, offended by Sumners speech, he considered the speech as libel on South Carolina, and Mr. Butler. First He thought of challenging Sumner to a duel but he did not believe Sumner to be a gentleman and decided to discipline Sumner with public beating. On May 22, 1856, Brooks waited in Senate Chamber for ladies to leave.While Sumner was seated at his desk, the Chamber was clear of ladies, Brooks walked up to Sumners desk and marked his feelings about Sumners speech as libel on South Carolina, and Mr. Butler. Brooks then started to strike the Senator with a gold headed gutta percha cane. First Sumner tried to defend himself but he was trapped between desk and his chair. After couple of hits Sumner was already blinded by his own blood, but that did not stopped Brooks. Brook kept hitting Sumner until his cane shattered. Brooks left the chamber after seeing Sumner collapsed unconscious on the floor.Later on Brooks informed his brother what happened, he wrote that he gave Sumner about30 first rate stripes with the cane and he wrote every lick went where I intended. Brooks action was celebrated by many Southerners and condemned by Northerners. Both men became heroes in their respective states. The caning of Charles Sumner was a symbolic of two regions conflict and factor of rising tension leading up to the American Civil War. Bibliography Gienapp, William E. The Crime Against Sumner The Caning of Charles Sumner and the Rise of the Republican Party. Civil War History pp. 218-245.September 1979. Geniapps journal provides a thorough examination of the caning of Charles Sumner and aftermath of the incident towards political parties. The author discusses how important this case was on the road to civil war. Woods, Michael E. The Indignation of Freedom-Loving People The Caning of Charles Sumner and Emotion in Antebellum Politics. Journal of Social History pp. 689-705. Spring 2011. Woodss journal provides the role of emotion in antebellum American politics and political culture through an analysis of the outraged northern response to the May 1856 caning of Charles Sumner.The author discusses how important was indignation in antebellum political culture. Sinha, Manisha. The Caning of Charles Sumner Slavery, Race, and Ideology in the Age of the Civil War. Journal of the Early Republic pp. 233-262. Summer 2003. Sinhas journal analyzes the argument of slavery, race and ideology motivated by the caning of Charles Sumner. White, Laura A. Was Charles Sumner Shamming, 1856-1859?. The New England Quarterly pp. 291-324. September 1960. Whites journal provides Sumners recovery and return to politics after Brooks attack. The author discusses both Northern and Southern response to the incident.Meriwether, Robert L. Preston S. Brooks on the Caning of Charles Sumner. The South Carolina Historical and Genealogical Magazine pp. 1-4. January 1951. Meriwethers journal provides the letters sent by Preston S. Brooks to his brother. Pierson, Michael D. All Southern Society IS Assailed by the Foulest Charges Charles Sumners The Crime against Kansas and the Escalation of Republican Anti-Slavery Rhetoric. The New England Quarterly pp. 531-557. December 1995. Piersons journal provides the detailed Crime against Kansas speech material. The author discusses if Sumner was offensive enough to get things physical.